Mifflandia Project Guides the Future of Mifflin Street Neighborhood

Mifflandia Project Guides the Future of Mifflin Street Neighborhood

The City of Madison began laying the groundwork for updates to the historic Mifflin Street neighborhood with its 2012 Downtown Plan, but from then until 2018, not much happened.

(Andrew Kraemer/Madison Commons)

Plans were made and forgotten, sometimes conflicting with each other along the way. But in the fall of 2018, the city launched the Mifflandia project, a planning initiative aimed at creating a real, viable plan for the area by engaging neighborhood residents.

Organizers hope aspects like free food and a relaxed atmosphere can attract residents who would otherwise have little interest in the planning process. The first meeting last October, for example, offered donuts as attendees were polled on topics like housing styles, affordability, sustainability, and business types residents would like to see in the Mifflin neighborhood.

(Andrew Kraemer/Madison Commons)

The project’s second major public meeting, March 4 at the Madison Senior Center, saw residents enjoying samosas and tea while they talked with city representatives and neighbors. After a quick message from Alder Michael Verveer, project coordinator Rebecca Cnare kicked things off with results from the October meeting’s polls and additional online surveys conducted since then on the same topics.

Mifflandia’s surveys found opinions and lifestyles had changed considerably since 2012, with people more open to taller buildings and less concerned about local retail options due to the growth of online shopping. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety continue to be major concerns, however, and changes to the Mifflin area also must fit into Madison’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan for development.

“Madison is expecting 70,000 new residents,” Cnare said. “That’s 40,000 new housing units in the next 20-plus years … we want to make sure we’re being smart about that growth. Infill development that’s really close to transit, jobs, education, the University, was something that our Comprehensive Plan really stressed.”

(Andrew Kraemer/Madison Commons)

In light of these new priorities, planners reassessed development possibilities. Planner Jeff Greger presented three new building height options in addition to the original 2012 arrangement. Notable among these was what Greger called a “four-plus-two” arrangement in which street-side facades would be limited to four stories, followed by a “set-back” that would allow building up to six stories farther back from the street. The style is designed to feel less blocky and monolithic and has been widely used across Madison and other cities in recent years.

Greger also presented a new possibility for the Mifflin Street block itself, a small street the group is calling the “Mifflin Lane Alternative.”

“The block between Mifflin and Washington is wider than normal and potentially would allow for an additional street to cut through the middle of the block,” Greger said. “For property owners who did not want to tear down their current buildings and redevelop it to a larger building, it would allow those buildings to remain, and it would allow those property owners to still get additional units to … rent out.”

Greger said the small street would also reduce the number of driveways on West Mifflin, meaning more street parking. With a narrower street, building residents would instead access their parking from the lane.

Finally, Greger outlined some possible locations for a public park in the Mifflin neighborhood, for which $8 million has already been secured according to Alder Verveer.

Greger and Verveer both emphasized that the city is still reaching out to landowners to see who might be willing to sell, but the Mifflandia team has options in mind right now. These include converting the U-Haul lot at Bedford Street and West Washington into green space, and keeping the historic depot building as a park shelter.

City planner Urvashi Martin closed the presentation by showing off some ideas addressing residents’ pedestrian and biker safety concerns. These included better-delineated bike lanes — some with flexible plastic buffers between bike and car lanes — flashing beacon crossings, and pedestrian refuge islands to help people cross high-traffic areas of West Washington. Refuge islands and new bike corrals could also enhance the area’s aesthetic through landscaping and public art installations.

In a Q&A session, attendees raised a wide range of concerns. Would adding bike lanes increase traffic jams, or might they reduce traffic by encouraging more people to bike? How do families fit into the new plan? Will developers have to adhere to sustainability standards? How will all of this impact taxes and property values?

It’s also concerning that despite the Mifflin neighborhood’s large student population, Cnare said of survey respondents, “Most of our participants have been over 55.”

Without the attendance of younger residents, planners will likely have to account for student concerns like housing affordability without their direct input.

The Mifflandia team will have to answer all these questions and others as they build their proposal over the coming months.

More information on the project and past meeting materials can be found here.


Written by:

266 Posts

View All Posts
Follow Me :

One thought on “Mifflandia Project Guides the Future of Mifflin Street Neighborhood

  1. I am a student at UW-Madison, and the houses on Mifflin St provide affordable residences for students like me, as well as a place to gather for the Mifflin block party every year. How can you guarantee that upzoning these properties will maintain the affordability of this neighborhood?? I would like to see a majority of these new units be rented out to students, as this is primarily a student-centered neighborhood and should stay that way.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *